The Forums

Parrahub1

As the farmers do not want power lines across their paddocks in Australia could the power made by Snowy 2 be transmitted via the Sydney to Melbourne Japanese SC maglev PS I found out that there is 100% p/a profit using HVDC cables in the Sydney to Melbourne tunnel so now you have $2b p/a from overni...

Parrahub1

The only reason they cost so much is because Japan does not use 60 Chinese like Australia could and build from Sydney to Melbourne in three years allowing it to make a profit of $2,000,000 per night with overnight container trains. PS By putting the HVDC cables in the Sydney to Melbourne tunnel it c...

Parrahub1

The Japanese SC maglev is already proven and all it needs is a aTBM tunnel to allow overnight container trains to go 700 km/h.

It seems like they are reinventing the wheel.

Parrahub1

If 30 separate companies spend $2b each to connect Parrahub to Melbourne via Canberra and Albury then I believe it would be fair they do not pay any tax until they earn a certain amount per annum but it would be up to the federal government how much that would be to encourage investment. By having t...

Parrahub1

That is the only problem with democracy it is the same with America.

Parrahub1

As you cannot have freight on true HSR I can imagine a slow uneconomical line with all the maintenance that SC maglev avoids.

Parrahub1

There is no way it can go fast with only 1 cm clearance and although they claim it will go faster than the Japanese SC maglev I have only seen videos of people pushing it.

Parrahub1

Nobody will ever build anything that does not make a profit with overnight SC maglev container trains reducing the daytime fare below planes.

Parrahub1

Nobody will ever build anything that does not make a profit with overnight SC maglev container trains reducing the daytime fare below planes.

Parrahub1

The downside of democracy, everyone wants a station in their town and greenies want to stop everything.

Parrahub1

Wow 50 km/h

Parrahub1

My Satnav gets lost so I would never trust driverless cars also Hyperloop is all hype and the only maglev China and Europe makes will not go fast enough to replace planes and trucks.

Parrahub1

Sorry about that mate.

In my opinion medium speed maglev will not be economically viable because it is too slow to beat trucks with an overnight container train over 1,000 km to reduce the daytime fare but that is just my opinion.

Parrahub1

It is incredable they call themselves "experts"

Parrahub1

Why try to reinvent the wheel when Japan has already proven a 600 km/h SC maglev and if is used in overnight container trains Sydney/Melbourne in an 11 psi single tunnel it will go 700 km/h and reduce the daytime fare below planes while earning $2,000,000 per night @$2,000 per container.

Parrahub1

Just because the Chinese have given up on a maglev train they want to stop Japan being successfull.

Parrahub1

Get someone from China who has the experience in driving below far greater inflows below the sea to explain to them about predrive grouting.

Parrahub1

There is a huge potential for the SC maglev to be exported around the world particularly where it can leapfrog the last century HSR but it must be economically viable with an overnight container train to reduce the daytime fares below planes ortherwise the whole world will be stuck with trucks and p...

Parrahub1

While the professor has many qualifications he does not have the experience of the Chinese with predrive grouting in tunnels.

Parrahub1

Where they say the letter demanded information it reminded me of the American democracy that had so many problems trying to please everybody the French HSR builders in California decide to go home. I believe there is a balance between peoples rights and the common good. Just ask the Chinese who have...

Parrahub1

Just because China will never be able to go 600 km/h with only 1 cm clearance the communist party of Japan wants to stop it.

Parrahub1

This old TBM did twice that average https://tunnelingonline.com/robbins-cro ... in-turkey/

Parrahub1

They would learn more developing a real SC maglev container train in the real world.

Parrahub1

Swallow their pride and get the Chinese to show them how it is done based on far greater experience.

Parrahub1

I agree it has to be fast enough to take an overnight container train to make it economically viable and you cannot get that with 1cm clearance.

Parrahub1

But if they want to sell it they have to make an overnight container train to reduce the daytime fare and get half the trucks off the road.

Parrahub1

Well if they developed a container train that reduced daytime fares below planes they could not only sell it to democries but it could easily remove the muck.

The Not In My Backyard NIMBYS are killing democrasies worldwide.

Parrahub1

I am sure the Chinese may be able to advise them with predrive grouting as they have driven past bigger inflows under the sea.

Parrahub1

Kameyama City with only 30,000 population and Japanese population shrinking perhaps it may be faster to skip it.

Parrahub1

It may work in some countries but in Australia our existing rail is too bendy for speed and being a democracy there are too many NIMBYS to use straight guideways on the surface I think it is better to keep slow wheels on existing rail and straight tunnels with an overnight SC container train to redu...

Parrahub1

The Chinese have demonstrated how they dealt with an inrush of water when they overcome a bigger one when they tunnelled beneath the sea so perhaps they can ask them. Even though Japan is better at SC maglev China is better at tunnels so they should cooperate with America to showcase an internation...

Parrahub1

Just build an overnight container train that will make it economical in big democracies like America as their existing rail and planes are yesterday technology and put it on YouTube in English if you want to sell the tech overseas.

Parrahub1

That is the problem in a democrasy there are too many NIMBYs

Parrahub1

China has much experience with tunnels, Japan has much experience with SC maglev and America is a huge country that needs a 700 km/h overnight container train between big cities to reduce daytime fares below planes. If they swallowed their pride and worked together showcasing it between Sydney and M...

Parrahub1

Well for a start the Japanese SC maglev has proven 600 km/h for ten years but it is parked while they extend the tunnel and 1,030 km/h is just BS.

Parrahub1

I think they are worried about nothing as tunnels are safer than viaducts and Japan has the best saftey record in the world in stopping the train and it cannot fall off a viaduct anyway.

Parrahub1

SC maglev is the future of train transport but it must have an overnight container train to reduce the daytime fare below planes but to go 700 km/h and prevent the surface problems it also must be done in a single 11 psi tunnel between big cities. My suggestion for the freight sidings is to make the...

Parrahub1

While they are doing the tunnel it may be a good opportunity to develop an overnight container train as they would never sell it to any big democrasy without it being economically viable.

Parrahub1

While I do think Africa has tremendous future potential, unless the SC maglev can take an overnight container train which is faster and cheaper in a single tinnel between big cities I cannot see it as being economically viable for just passengers.

Parrahub1

With Japan having a smaller population in the future, building another station which slows the SC maglev needs a rethink.

Parrahub1

I always believe that your first loss is your best loss, there is no point in throwing good money after bad.

Parrahub1

It is hard to believe they are still wasting money on Hyperloop.

Parrahub1

Very pretty but will not sell for passengers, it needs an overnight container train to lower daytime fares below planes in a big democracy.

Parrahub1

But they will never sell it overseas as it cannot carry an overnight container train which makes it uneconomical in big democracies.

Parrahub1

The proven Japanese SC maglev only needs an overnight container train to reduce daytime fares below planes so why waste money on trying to change proven maglev and proven containers?

Parrahub1

You do not have to reinvent the wheel as the Japanese SC maglev will go 600 km/h and in a single 11 psi tunnel go 700 km/h with an overnight container train to make daytime passenger fares cheaper than planes.

Parrahub1

It may be OK in a dictatorship but there would be too much resistance in a democracy so you could not sell the technology everywhere.

Parrahub1

In their dreams because they will not do that with 1 cm clearance.

Parrahub1

In my opinion they have more money than sense.

Parrahub1

It seems they realise they are stuck with trucks and have given up on the one cm maglev as it is too slow and expensive.

Parrahub1

You can have as many signatures as you like and if it is uneconomical passenger only it will never happen. There needs to be a international guideway that can take a 700 km/h overnight container train showcased between Sydney and Melbourne Australia which earns $2,000,000 per night reducing the dayt...

Parrahub1

The Chinese have demonstrated how they dealt with an inrush of water when they overcome a bigger one when they tunnelled beneath the sea so perhaps they can ask them. Even though Japan is better at SC maglev China is better at tunnels so they should cooperate with America to showcase an internationa...

Parrahub1

Unless they use Japanese SC maglev technology they will always be stuck with trucks like China because it is too slow to be economical.

Parrahub1

The Japanese SC maglev will never be able to be sold as is because it is uneconomical without having an overnight container train to reduce the daytime fare below planes in big countries. It would need an international guideway showcased between Sydney and Melbourne designed by China with greater ex...

Parrahub1

Ask the Chinese how they managed to deal with an inrush of water when they successfully drove a tunnel beneath the sea.

Parrahub1

As China has much more experiance in overcoming water inrush how about getting them to help especially as Japan will never sell the SC maglev to big democratic countries and China would never be able to do 600 km/h with 1 cm clearance. The two countries need to work together with America to showcase...

Parrahub1

It may be an ego trip for Japan but unless the SC maglev can have a 700 km/h overnight container train to reduce daytime fares below planes it will never be exported to big democratic countries.

Parrahub1

It may work in a dictatorship but there would be too many NIMBYS in a democratic country, it has to be underground.

Parrahub1

Too many stations waste the advantage of SC maglev

Parrahub1

Unless it is showcased as economically viable with an overnight container train to reduce daytime fares lower than planes it would never be used in a big democracy.

Parrahub1

Not only is the German maglev not as fast as the S C maglev but it costs too much to build and maintain with one centimetre clearance.

Parrahub1

It needs to be in a big pressure reduced tunnel(11 psi) to allow heavy overnight container trains to make it economical between two big cities.

Parrahub1

China has driven a tunnel beneath the sea with a greater inflow than Japan so it may be an idea to ask them how they did it.
file:///C:/Users/miste/Downloads/applsci-11-03645.pdf

Parrahub1

The only way to have an economical international SC maglev in America is to put it in a single straight 11 psi tunnel designed by China, Japan and America to reduce the daytime fares below planes.

Parrahub1

Be better if it went 700 km/h in a single 11 psi tunnel like I suggest for an international overnight container train between Sydney and Melbourne killing planes and reducing the 700,000 B doubles on the Hume

Parrahub1

You can do anytjing in a dictatorship.

Parrahub1

At 120 km/h it is too slow to run overnight 1,000 km so it cannot subsidise daytime fares and remove planes.

Be better if China, Japan and America developed the Sydney/Melbourne overnight container maglev to international standard.

Parrahub1

I know the Japanese maglev is not designed for overnight containers but it would be easy for China, Japan, and America to develop the Sydney to Melbourne one in a single 11psi tunnel which allows 700 km/h with passing stations at Canberra and Albury to enable daytime fares lower than planes saving 5...

Parrahub1

America wants HSR but it is uneconomical because it cannot take overnight container trains like Japanese maglev could making them faster and more profitable than the existing slow trains. As the wheels would only be on the ground for four kilometres at each station it could stop anywhere needed thro...

Parrahub1

Big cities in big countries can never be connected with maglev trains in the daytime unless an overnight maglev container train is developed for international use preferably by Japan, China, America and Australia between Sydney and Melbourne. The container trains can go between freight sidings on th...

Parrahub1

Big cities in big countries can never be connected with maglev trains in the daytime unless an overnight maglev container train is developed for international use preferably by Japan, China, America and Australia between Sydney and Melbourne. The container trains can go between freight sidings on th...

Parrahub1

Competition is good but sometimes cooperation is needed when something will be used internationally and as a Japanese maglev is too expensive just for passengers I suggest Japan, China and Australia cooperate to build a maglev from Sydney to Melbourne with passing stations at Canberra and Albury tha...

Parrahub1

PS
20 multimodal TBM like Florence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeTrLPx6h3U&t=1s could drive stage one Sydney to Canberra in one year.

Parrahub1

As Snowy 2 is being built to stabilise green power and high voltage DC power is all the go nowadays to connect green energy to where it is used, could 2 high voltage DC cables be put in the single tunnel between Sydney and Melbourne so whatever frequency is needed can be produced with a DC motor con...

Parrahub1

The title of the report is quite blunt: Virgin Hyperloop’s mass layoffs and pivot to freight all but kill the dream of traveling by tube https://fortune.com/2022/02/22/virgin-hyperloop-layoffs-fires-staff-freight-tube-travel-richard-branson/ Accessed: 2022-02-22 To make it economically viable it ha...

Parrahub1

The big problem with passenger maglev is the cost, but the daytime fare could be reduced below that of planes between Sydney and Melbourne saving 5,000,000 tonnes of jet fuel per year while reducing the 500,000 trucks per year and getting the freight to freight sidings 8 hours faster in an overnigh...

Parrahub1

For a start I think Hyperloop would never work but to make a train profitable it must have an overnight container train and this is much easier in tunnels as there is no weight limit.

Parrahub1

Japanese 700 km/h maglev is the only way to go in 11 psi breathable 14 meter diameter straight tunnels with no windows necessary.

Parrahub1

China has a maglev mock up that goes just as fast.

Parrahub1

Sorry but it would be too slow for overnight container trains and too expensive to maintain in my opinion.

Parrahub1

In my opinion people would not travel in a small tube in a vacuum but if it is a Japanese maglev that does 700 km/h with overnight container trains to make it economical then I think they would with the cheap daytime daytime fares. To answer your question about removal of air I suggest if it is in a...

Parrahub1

As overnight non stop 700 km/h overnight Japanese maglev trains in single 11 psi, 14 meter diameter tunnel earn enough to make daytime fares cheaper than planes it does not really matter if there are a couple of stops in a big city as the freight which you cannot use on HSR makes it economical. Rega...

Parrahub1

Thanks Parrahub1! Thank you mate. I have another couple of thoughts that have occurred to me and where high speed steel rail cannot have overnight container trains a Japanese maglev can earning at $1/kg up to $20,000,000 per night competing with planes and making the $60,000,000,000 tunnel viable w...

Parrahub1

The big problem with passenger maglev is the cost, but the daytime fare could be reduced below that of planes between Sydney and Melbourne saving 5,000,000 tonnes of jet fuel per year while reducing the 500,000 trucks per year and getting the freight to freight sidings 8 hours faster in an overnight...

Search found 84 matches