The Forums

Parrahub1

Australia is a great place to showcase SC maglev overnight container trains having a variety of gauges/power and big enough to beat trucks by 8 hours earning sufficient to allow the daytime only $10. I cannot understand why they do not have a lottery for the Parrahub building with such a shortage of...

Parrahub1

Anything under 1,000 kilometres is not worth double handling containers but if it was in a straight tunnel over 1,000 km it could earn enough to subsidise daytime fares.

Parrahub1

Meet the press Ed Husic minister for industry and science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvTVhtgFowU&pp=ygUdbmF0aW9uYWwgcHJlc3MgY2x1YiBhdXN0cmFsaWE%3D If he decides to connect Melbourne to Sydney with SC maglev earning $1.4b p/a selling the tech to big countries worldwide the Liberals, Indepen...

Parrahub1

That is the problem with the SC maglev like the president says you may as well have wheels if you are going to stop every 100 kilometres.

PS

Many apoligies because the SC maglev acceletates so rapidly and I was wrong.

Parrahub1

A workmate once said to me you have to want to do it and I think as the Japanese president wants slow wheels that stop everywhere it is hard to drive the tunnel when everybody is against it.

Parrahub1

After the failure of the airport line in China that subsided over time resulting in a rough ride perhaps they could use a hybrid maglev that has conventional wheels with the maglev system for acceleration/deceleration as the stops are only 1 km apart.

Parrahub1

This is the email I sent to Parramatta council yesterday. As Parrahub would be within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets I believe it would be possible to share the SC maglev platforms with Parrahub rather than competing with One city square in Church street. I believe stage two to Br...

Parrahub1

Australia cannot make everything domestically and unlike America we have to be free traders and we are big enough to use overnight container trains unlike Japan where even the president wants wheels. The only opposition from connecting Melbourne to Sydney overnight SC maglev would come from the airc...

Parrahub1

I cannot believe that people still believe in that stuff.

Parrahub1

This is the email I sent to Parramatta council yesterday. As Parrahub would be within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets I believe it would be possible to share the SC maglev platforms with Parrahub rather than competing with One city square in Church street. I believe stage two to Bri...

Parrahub1

Saw my sister who loves travel in planes and asked her if she would use a maglev train if it was anywhere for $10 and she said she would use the maglev train.

Parrahub1

To avoid complex points at Parrahub/western Sydney branch and to allow overnight container trains to be pushed anywhere on the hardstand for loading/unloading I suggest the front wheels on the SC maglev are steerable. Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone. https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/nor...

Parrahub1

Because the tunnel has to be in a straight line vertically and horizontally between cities the 14 m diameter TBM must be able to penetrate any type ground and the two stations at each city on the double guideway passing stations would be accessed only by very big elevators.

Parrahub1

Maglev said “The news appears to be at least partially accurate. All currently known technical systems for Maglev are being researched and tested in China. However, Tesla should have relatively little to do with this.” As CLARA is already in bed with Japanese SC maglev and although their value captu...

Parrahub1

With $10 fares and no trucks and planes on that route it would get every voter in Australia.

Parrahub1

With the president and Japanese communist party against SC maglev it may be best to showcase SC maglev with overnight container trains in Australia

Parrahub1

With the latest Japanese president wanting to use last century tech and China realising EMS is too costly to build and maintain it is a golden opportunity for Australia to demonstrate EDS overnight container trains that will earn AU$1.4b p/a connecting Melbourne to western Sydney airport subsidising...

Parrahub1

Is Tesla building a EDS train in China or is it fake news.

Parrahub1

Good news that they are overcoming their problems.

Parrahub1

To be economically viable to connect Melbourne to Brisbane a 600 km/h train must be used but because Australians have only experienced the EMS Chinese airport line they want wheels.
It would be good if Japan invited a group of advisors to experience the SC maglev.

Parrahub1

I had the wrong link but I changed it where I am the top comment about China developing a EDS Tesla train.

Parrahub1

China is talking about building a EDS train like Japan.
https://youtu.be/PLxn8WGjajU

Parrahub1

Few people from Australia have experienced the SC maglev and I am worried that we may get wheels or Chinese EMS.

Would it be possible for a group of advisors to experience it.

Regards Eddy

Parrahub1

Built by Germany with EMS technology the 1cm clearance means the guideway has to be dead level with huge foundations but over the years they have subsided so it is rocking so much it has to go slower. Because everybody uses it they are looking at going back to wheels so I suggest the Japanese SC mag...

Parrahub1

The opposition is a joke and it must be very embarrasing for the government.

Parrahub1

As China can drive Sydney to Melbourne in two years with a 14m diameter tunnel to allow overnight container trains, Japan should build them while waiting to finish the tunnel so they can be showcased and exported to suitable big countries. Value capture never worked for CLARA in Australia and it wil...

Parrahub1

You really need to build overnight container trains while you are waiting for the tunnel to be finished so they can be showcased in stage one Melbourne to Sydney WSA

Parrahub1

What they should do while they are waiting for the tunnel to be finished is to design an overnight container train for big countries that can subsidise daytime fares below planes.

Parrahub1

This is the email i sent to CEO of CLARA Hi Nick Japan wants to use development to redeem money with the SC maglev but it would it better to subsidise daytime fares with overnight container trains earning $1.4b p/a eliminating trucks and planes between Melbourne and Sydney WSA. A secure 14 meter dia...

Parrahub1

Good luck with that ha ha

Parrahub1

It all depends on which country built it.

Parrahub1

Japan wants to redeem costs for the SC maglev the same way as CLARA in Australia but as a single tunnel is more secure and cost no more it can earn $1.4b p/a with overnight container trains keeping the daytime fares to $10. So instead of trying to claw back money with development they should develop...

Parrahub1

With Japan’s decreasing population, rather than encouraging develop along the line it may be better to develop an overnight container train while waiting for the tunnel to be finished which can be showcased connecting Melbourne to Brisbane and exported worldwide.

Parrahub1

His boring company has not made any breakthroughs just by trying to push the discs harder.

Parrahub1

Apolagies I thought it was drill and blast there.
Just ignore the communist party miss maglev.

Parrahub1

While they are waiting for the tunnel to get finished they ought to get some Australians to develop the overnight container trains earning AU $1.4 p/a and reducing daytime fares to just AU$10 anywhere.

Parrahub1

Maybe they would be better off using a TBM

Parrahub1

I feel rather than having another talkfest we need to showcase the Japanese SC maglev but I may have been out of order.

Parrahub1

Did they try predrive grouting with it?

Parrahub1

It looks like they are using the Japanese EDS instead of the Chinese EMS

Parrahub1

Connecting Sydney WSA to Melbourne with overnight container trains earning $1.4b p/a will get bipartisan support with daytime fares only $10 anywhere with half hour frequency. Because proven 1997 to 2011 daytime 600 km/h southbound daytime Japanese SC maglev trains have to wait half an hour while no...

Parrahub1

Why an underground Japanese SC maglev? It enables a secure straight tunnel that is no more expensive than on the surface. This enables the overnight container trains to replace trucks as it has to go 600 km/h which is impossible with wheels. A single guideway between passing stations allows this spe...

Parrahub1

Perhaps China wants to can it because it is faster and cheaper than their EMS maglev with only 1 cm clearance.
In Australia we often have methane bubbles in our creeks but it is no big problem especially if the tunnel is well ventilated.

Parrahub1

It is nearly impossible in a democracy, even in Japan where fhey are underground the next state wants to stop it.

Parrahub1

A Communist party in Japan amazing, is there a democratic party in China?
We had bubbles when we drove under Sydney harbour and it was alright they just are using any excuse to stop it.

Parrahub1

That is where democracy fails.

Parrahub1

I know they want to put a HSR Newcastle to Sydney first but it would be easier to get bipartisan support connecting Sydney to Melbourne via Canberra and Albury first so a return of $1.4b p/a can be achieved on the $100 b project in three years. To allow trains to come from all directions in the futu...

Parrahub1

Problems I see are the huge foundations and slow speed.

Parrahub1

Have they asked the Chinese for their expertise ?

Parrahub1

My five cents is nuclear for the extra power needed for data centres then connect Sydney to Melbourne with the overnight Japanese SC maglev and as the tunnel goes directly below Snowy 2 put HVDC cables in it to save $4b on the Hume overhead transmission. If the tunnel is 14m diameter the SC maglev c...

Parrahub1

Any maglev has to be profitable with 600 km/h overnight container trains to replace trucks and planes over 1,000 km so while they driving the tunnel they should build a maglev train to showcase it connecting Melbourne to Sydney. Even though China has the most experience in the world with TBM they ca...

Parrahub1

Japan just needs China expertise to drive the tunnel.

Parrahub1

Many people say it cannot carry a container train but surely it can have extra magnets on each container what do people think ? After thinking about it each 40 foot container is only half the length of a SC maglev carriage and as every container has to be light enough to go on a truck there would b...

Parrahub1

If the tunnel is 14m diameter the SC maglev can earn AU $1.4b p/a with an overnight container train making daytime fares only AU $10 to anywhere between Sydney and Melbourne for stage one. Using fly in fly out Chinese expert teams with 60 TBM from 30 launch sites it would be driven in two years so t...

Parrahub1

It is a waste of time trying to get heavy electric trucks to go long distance when the overnight container train on the Sydney/Melbourne route is faster and cheaper without having to find 700,000 drivers p/a.

Parrahub1

As a container trainer is far lighter than a conventional freight train it can go overnight between Melbourne and Sydney in a 14m diameter tunnel that earns $1,400,000,000 p/a allowing the daytime ride only $10 which leaves every half hour replacing cars and trucks.

Parrahub1

Many people say it cannot carry a container train but surely it can have extra magnets on each container what do people think ?

Parrahub1

To avoid complex points i suggest the front wheels are steerable and to minimise the size needed for a freight terminal in western Sydney the northbound trains to Brisbane would be pushed next to each other on the hardstand.

Parrahub1

The 12 maglev elevators leave sufficient room for a supermarket to use the whole floor in the Parrahub building.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web

Parrahub1

Because NSW is having a study on transport I sent this email to Jo Haylen. True HSR will not take freight so it is unprofitable but with 60 Chinese double shield hardrock TBM a single tunnel connecting Sydney to Melbourne Via Canberra and Albury will remove trucks and planes from that route in three...

Parrahub1

That explains it.

Parrahub1

Was it made in Japan or China?

Parrahub1

They should stop the excavation and use the SC maglev as a tourist attraction and develop an overnight container train to connect Sydney to Melbourne via Canberra and Albury that will earn twice as much as just a daytime fare. At present China keeps saying it has got the fastest train in the world w...

Parrahub1

After watching Jeff Dimery on the National press club of Australia today I think we will have small 300 mw nuclear reactors replacing coal fired generators keeping the towns alive and using surplus power through HVDC cables in the tunnel making it even more profitable.

Parrahub1

After watching Jeff Dimery on the National press club of Australia today I think we will have small 300 mw nuclear reactors replacing coal fired generators keeping the towns alive and using surplus power through HVDC cables in the tunnel making it even more profitable.

Parrahub1

As it is only single guideway between passing stations with a breathable 11 psi it allows the container train to go as fast as the LO maglev in a smaller atmospheric tunnel. The comparison can be seen here on your phone. https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/northAmerica/Tl4G7kaL69I?stoken=xhCOzMNBqFSIk...

Parrahub1

As it would only take two years to drive from Sydney to Melbourne with 60 Chinese double shield hardrock TBM it may be better to forget about the greenies in Japan and think about making an overnight container train for Australia to double the income.

Parrahub1

To avoid complex points I suggest the front wheels are made steerable to access freight sidings on the outer suburbs.

Parrahub1

To balance our trade with China I suggest Australia buys 60 double shield hard rock TBM off them to drive the tunnel in two years creating peace in the south China sea. As well as having overnight container trains to double the earnings it can also take the HVDC cables from snowy 2 earning up to $12...

Parrahub1

When I put the specs on invideo AI it came up with this in a minute. https://ai.invideo.io/workspace/ee74d2b0-a234-40b8-b836-3256c1f4655d/v2-copilot/14117f3c-28ef-4b52-915c-51ea7b27904d Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone. https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/northAmerica/ZX8eVeqUb14?stoken=yMv...

Parrahub1

When I put the specs on invideo AI it came up with this in a minute. https://ai.invideo.io/workspace/ee74d2b0-a234-40b8-b836-3256c1f4655d/v2-copilot/14117f3c-28ef-4b52-915c-51ea7b27904d Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone. https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/northAmerica/ZX8eVeqUb14?stoken=yMv...

Parrahub1

Why do they have a video of the Japanese SC maglev when I bet it is the Chinese maglev limited to people at 300 km/h

Parrahub1

With only 1 cm claerance the track costs too much to build and maintain and it can never take freight in my opinion where the Japanese SC maglev has 10 cm clearance all it needs is a 14m diameter TBM tunnel and a few extra magnets to have a overnight container trains loaded and unloaded through the ...

Parrahub1

Have JR thought about getting Cat bonds before finishing the tunnel?

Parrahub1

China has 16229 tunnels so it may be good to ask them how to drive it.

Parrahub1

It is faster even at 20 days to use trucks rather than rail from China to Europe so they really need a Japanese SC maglev that can take overnight container trains so the pallatised freight is the answer for the world with daytime smaller trains to reduce risk. https://www.logisticspeople-community.c...

Parrahub1

Get the Chinese to drive it as even though they are hopeless at maglev trains they are great at tunnels.

Parrahub1

That is the only problem with democracy.

Parrahub1

How does China expect fast maglev with only 1 cm clearance?

Parrahub1

I would like to add that the HVDC cables in the tunnel would not be blown down like happened yesterday to the Victorian power transmission above ground.

Parrahub1

If you want to replace planes and trucks over 1,000 kilometers you only have a couple passing stations and use the proven 600 km/h Japanese SC maglev.

If you want to use the slower Chinese maglev with many stations then that would be the cheapest.

It all depends on what you need.

Parrahub1

There are claims that China has a maglev train that goes 623 km/h but I cannot see that with only 1 cm clearance.

https://www.iflscience.com/chinas-hyper ... hour-72860

Parrahub1

EMS may be ok for around town but if they want to export it to China it would have to be EDS because the guideway costs too much to build and maintain with only 1 cm clearance.

Parrahub1

Don't they even know where they are going yet?

Parrahub1

I think it is better to build it in straight big TBM driven tunnel between stations that are no closer than 200 kilometers apart to avoid everybody wanting a station at their town or opposition from farmers, greens and NIMBYS. The larger tunnels will allow overnight container trains and possibly ext...

Parrahub1

As the farmers do not want power lines across their paddocks in Australia could the power made by Snowy 2 be transmitted via the Sydney to Melbourne Japanese SC maglev PS I found out that there is 100% p/a profit using HVDC cables in the Sydney to Melbourne tunnel so now you have $2b p/a from overni...

Parrahub1

The only reason they cost so much is because Japan does not use 60 Chinese like Australia could and build from Sydney to Melbourne in three years allowing it to make a profit of $2,000,000 per night with overnight container trains. PS By putting the HVDC cables in the Sydney to Melbourne tunnel it c...

Parrahub1

The Japanese SC maglev is already proven and all it needs is a aTBM tunnel to allow overnight container trains to go 700 km/h.

It seems like they are reinventing the wheel.

Parrahub1

If 30 separate companies spend $2b each to connect Parrahub to Melbourne via Canberra and Albury then I believe it would be fair they do not pay any tax until they earn a certain amount per annum but it would be up to the federal government how much that would be to encourage investment. By having t...

Parrahub1

That is the only problem with democracy it is the same with America.

Parrahub1

As you cannot have freight on true HSR I can imagine a slow uneconomical line with all the maintenance that SC maglev avoids.

Parrahub1

There is no way it can go fast with only 1 cm clearance and although they claim it will go faster than the Japanese SC maglev I have only seen videos of people pushing it.

Parrahub1

Nobody will ever build anything that does not make a profit with overnight SC maglev container trains reducing the daytime fare below planes.

Parrahub1

Nobody will ever build anything that does not make a profit with overnight SC maglev container trains reducing the daytime fare below planes.

Parrahub1

The downside of democracy, everyone wants a station in their town and greenies want to stop everything.

Parrahub1

Wow 50 km/h

Parrahub1

My Satnav gets lost so I would never trust driverless cars also Hyperloop is all hype and the only maglev China and Europe makes will not go fast enough to replace planes and trucks.

Parrahub1

Sorry about that mate.

In my opinion medium speed maglev will not be economically viable because it is too slow to beat trucks with an overnight container train over 1,000 km to reduce the daytime fare but that is just my opinion.

Parrahub1

It is incredable they call themselves "experts"

Parrahub1

Why try to reinvent the wheel when Japan has already proven a 600 km/h SC maglev and if is used in overnight container trains Sydney/Melbourne in an 11 psi single tunnel it will go 700 km/h and reduce the daytime fare below planes while earning $2,000,000 per night @$2,000 per container.

Search found 169 matches