Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Competition is good but sometimes cooperation is needed when something will be used internationally and as a Japanese maglev is too expensive just for passengers I suggest Japan, China and Australia cooperate to build a maglev from Sydney to Melbourne with passing stations at Canberra and Albury that can earn $2,000,000 every night with overnight containers to subsidise daytime fares saving 5,000,000 tonnes jet fuel per year plus reduce the 700,000 B doubles on the Hume.
20 multimodal TBM like Florence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeTrLPx6h3U&t=1s could drive stage one Sydney to Canberra in one year.
PS
Another thing I would like to point out is the overnight container train can go between the freight sidings 8 hours faster than any truck for next morning delivery and it may be possible to avoid complex points just by having the front wheels steerable as they would be down at the slow speed.
20 multimodal TBM like Florence https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeTrLPx6h3U&t=1s could drive stage one Sydney to Canberra in one year.
PS
Another thing I would like to point out is the overnight container train can go between the freight sidings 8 hours faster than any truck for next morning delivery and it may be possible to avoid complex points just by having the front wheels steerable as they would be down at the slow speed.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
If 30 separate companies spend $2b each to connect Parrahub to Melbourne via Canberra and Albury then I believe it would be fair they do not pay any tax until they earn a certain amount per annum but it would be up to the federal government how much that would be to encourage investment.
By having two teams of FIFO East Timorese getting paid $5,000 per fortnight or when they achieve 200 m driving in different directions and living in shipping containers at the launch site compound it will remove trucks and planes between Sydney and Melbourne in a few years.
Because the Japanese SC maglev has nothing touching that needs maintenance it is free from inflation like trucks and planes so by undercutting them a tad in time it would earn 10% p/a of the initial $2b they invested and would start to pay tax.
As well as connecting Sydney to Melbourne with a profitable 700 km/h Japanese SC maglev it would balance our trade with China removing the need to spend money on nuclear submarines and also help with the unemployment in East Timor without creating more housing demand but some people cannot see this.
By having two teams of FIFO East Timorese getting paid $5,000 per fortnight or when they achieve 200 m driving in different directions and living in shipping containers at the launch site compound it will remove trucks and planes between Sydney and Melbourne in a few years.
Because the Japanese SC maglev has nothing touching that needs maintenance it is free from inflation like trucks and planes so by undercutting them a tad in time it would earn 10% p/a of the initial $2b they invested and would start to pay tax.
As well as connecting Sydney to Melbourne with a profitable 700 km/h Japanese SC maglev it would balance our trade with China removing the need to spend money on nuclear submarines and also help with the unemployment in East Timor without creating more housing demand but some people cannot see this.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
When I put the specs on invideo AI it came up with this in a minute.
https://ai.invideo.io/workspace/ee74d2b ... ea7b27904d
Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
Parrahub 5,000 units above on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
https://ai.invideo.io/workspace/ee74d2b ... ea7b27904d
Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
Parrahub 5,000 units above on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
After watching Jeff Dimery on the National press club of Australia today I think we will have small 300 mw nuclear reactors replacing coal fired generators keeping the towns alive and using surplus power through HVDC cables in the tunnel making it even more profitable.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
To avoid complex points i suggest the front wheels are steerable and to minimise the size needed for a freight terminal in western Sydney the northbound trains to Brisbane would be pushed next to each other on the hardstand.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Many people say it cannot carry a container train but surely it can have extra magnets on each container what do people think ?
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
As a container trainer is far lighter than a conventional freight train it can go overnight between Melbourne and Sydney in a 14m diameter tunnel that earns $1,400,000,000 p/a allowing the daytime ride only $10 which leaves every half hour replacing cars and trucks.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
It is a waste of time trying to get heavy electric trucks to go long distance when the overnight container train on the Sydney/Melbourne route is faster and cheaper without having to find 700,000 drivers p/a.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
After thinking about it each 40 foot container is only half the length of a SC maglev carriage and as every container has to be light enough to go on a truck there would be no problem at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=za3pZto ... ViZQ%3D%3D
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Why an underground Japanese SC maglev?
It enables a secure straight tunnel that is no more expensive than on the surface.
This enables the overnight container trains to replace trucks as it has to go 600 km/h which is impossible with wheels.
A single guideway between passing stations allows this speed.
By having twin guideways at passing stations it allows 2 stations at each city where trains southbound wait while northbound trains are doing 600 km/h and vice versa.
This allows daytime trains to leave each city every half hour for only $10 to anywhere as the income comes from replacing trucks and planes.
A 14 meter diameter single tunnel can be driven Sydney to Melbourne in two years by FIFO Chinese workers with 60 TBM from 30 launch sites with a further year to install the Japanese SC maglev.
It enables a secure straight tunnel that is no more expensive than on the surface.
This enables the overnight container trains to replace trucks as it has to go 600 km/h which is impossible with wheels.
A single guideway between passing stations allows this speed.
By having twin guideways at passing stations it allows 2 stations at each city where trains southbound wait while northbound trains are doing 600 km/h and vice versa.
This allows daytime trains to leave each city every half hour for only $10 to anywhere as the income comes from replacing trucks and planes.
A 14 meter diameter single tunnel can be driven Sydney to Melbourne in two years by FIFO Chinese workers with 60 TBM from 30 launch sites with a further year to install the Japanese SC maglev.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
This is the email i sent to CEO of CLARA
Hi Nick
Japan wants to use development to redeem money with the SC maglev but it would it better to subsidise daytime fares with overnight container trains earning $1.4b p/a eliminating trucks and planes between Melbourne and Sydney WSA.
A secure 14 meter diameter tunnel can be driven by FIFO Chinese workers from 30 launch site compounds with 60 double shield hardrock TBM in two years followed by the installation of Snowy 2 HVDC cables and the Japanese SC maglev.
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
Hi Nick
Japan wants to use development to redeem money with the SC maglev but it would it better to subsidise daytime fares with overnight container trains earning $1.4b p/a eliminating trucks and planes between Melbourne and Sydney WSA.
A secure 14 meter diameter tunnel can be driven by FIFO Chinese workers from 30 launch site compounds with 60 double shield hardrock TBM in two years followed by the installation of Snowy 2 HVDC cables and the Japanese SC maglev.
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Few people from Australia have experienced the SC maglev and I am worried that we may get wheels or Chinese EMS.
Would it be possible for a group of advisors to experience it.
Regards Eddy
Would it be possible for a group of advisors to experience it.
Regards Eddy
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
China is talking about building a EDS train like Japan.
https://youtu.be/PLxn8WGjajU
https://youtu.be/PLxn8WGjajU
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
I had the wrong link but I changed it where I am the top comment about China developing a EDS Tesla train.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
To be economically viable to connect Melbourne to Brisbane a 600 km/h train must be used but because Australians have only experienced the EMS Chinese airport line they want wheels.
It would be good if Japan invited a group of advisors to experience the SC maglev.
It would be good if Japan invited a group of advisors to experience the SC maglev.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Is Tesla building a EDS train in China or is it fake news.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
The news appears to be at least partially accurate. All currently known technical systems for Maglev are being researched and tested in China. However, Tesla should have relatively little to do with this.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
With the latest Japanese president wanting to use last century tech and China realising EMS is too costly to build and maintain it is a golden opportunity for Australia to demonstrate EDS overnight container trains that will earn AU$1.4b p/a connecting Melbourne to western Sydney airport subsidising daytime fares to AU$10 anywhere for 24 hours killing trucks and planes on that route.
Stage one Melbourne to Sydney via Albury and Canberra will also allow HVDC cables in the 14metre diameter tunnel instead of the expensive overhead Humelink.
It can be driven in two years with Chinese TBM expertise with 60 TBM from 30 launch sites.
Because an overnight container train is limited by what the electric semitrailer can legally carry and a 40 foot container is half the length of the SC maglev passenger train carriage it can have a normal SC magnet either end.
Stage one Melbourne to Sydney via Albury and Canberra will also allow HVDC cables in the 14metre diameter tunnel instead of the expensive overhead Humelink.
It can be driven in two years with Chinese TBM expertise with 60 TBM from 30 launch sites.
Because an overnight container train is limited by what the electric semitrailer can legally carry and a 40 foot container is half the length of the SC maglev passenger train carriage it can have a normal SC magnet either end.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
With $10 fares and no trucks and planes on that route it would get every voter in Australia.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Maglev said “The news appears to be at least partially accurate. All currently known technical systems for Maglev are being researched and tested in China. However, Tesla should have relatively little to do with this.”
As CLARA is already in bed with Japanese SC maglev and although their value capture business model did not stack up it would be far better to use Chinese TBM expertise to connect Melbourne to Sydney and buy the existing technology off Japan rather than China trying to learn EDS.
As CLARA is already in bed with Japanese SC maglev and although their value capture business model did not stack up it would be far better to use Chinese TBM expertise to connect Melbourne to Sydney and buy the existing technology off Japan rather than China trying to learn EDS.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Because the tunnel has to be in a straight line vertically and horizontally between cities the 14 m diameter TBM must be able to penetrate any type ground and the two stations at each city on the double guideway passing stations would be accessed only by very big elevators.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
To avoid complex points at Parrahub/western Sydney branch and to allow overnight container trains to be pushed anywhere on the hardstand for loading/unloading I suggest the front wheels on the SC maglev are steerable.
Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
Parrahub 5,000 units above on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
Parrahub 30.000 space carpark on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
Parrahub 5,000 units above on your phone.
https://app.sketchup.com/share/tc/north ... source=web
https://youtu.be/za3pZto7OB4
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Saw my sister who loves travel in planes and asked her if she would use a maglev train if it was anywhere for $10 and she said she would use the maglev train.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
This is the email I sent to Parramatta council yesterday.
As Parrahub would be within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets I believe it would be possible to share the SC maglev platforms with Parrahub rather than competing with One city square in Church street.
I believe stage two to Brisbane should go beneath the Parramatta river in good ground and that is why the station is at the base of the 30,000 space carpark.
Property would be bought with lottery funds so there is no risk and no pushback from locals when excavation starts which would take a year while designing the building but my emails have fallen on deaf ears so maybe Parramatta council could run it.
Parrahub depends on a lottery to avoid interest payments and pressure to cut corners on the flood proof and earthquake proof building designed to stand 200 years.
As Parrahub would be within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets I believe it would be possible to share the SC maglev platforms with Parrahub rather than competing with One city square in Church street.
I believe stage two to Brisbane should go beneath the Parramatta river in good ground and that is why the station is at the base of the 30,000 space carpark.
Property would be bought with lottery funds so there is no risk and no pushback from locals when excavation starts which would take a year while designing the building but my emails have fallen on deaf ears so maybe Parramatta council could run it.
Parrahub depends on a lottery to avoid interest payments and pressure to cut corners on the flood proof and earthquake proof building designed to stand 200 years.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Australia cannot make everything domestically and unlike America we have to be free traders and we are big enough to use overnight container trains unlike Japan where even the president wants wheels.
The only opposition from connecting Melbourne to Sydney overnight SC maglev would come from the aircraft industry as removing 700,000 drivers p/a from the Hume would suit transport people while improving productivity and reducing prices.
With an election coming up everybody would love it and once it is proven here we can export it to big countries worldwide and now is the ideal time to use Chinese TBM expertise to drive stage one in two years.
The only opposition from connecting Melbourne to Sydney overnight SC maglev would come from the aircraft industry as removing 700,000 drivers p/a from the Hume would suit transport people while improving productivity and reducing prices.
With an election coming up everybody would love it and once it is proven here we can export it to big countries worldwide and now is the ideal time to use Chinese TBM expertise to drive stage one in two years.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
The Parramatta council wanted to know how I felt about increasing the height of Parramatta square to which I agreed and told them we could share the SC maglev platforms to Brisbane as the buildings are so close and Parrahub is deep enough to drive beneath Parramatta river in good ground.Parrahub1 wrote: ↑1. Feb 2025, 20:19This is the email I sent to Parramatta council yesterday.
As Parrahub would be within Lansdowne, Inkerman, Boundary and Church streets I believe it would be possible to share the SC maglev platforms with Parrahub rather than competing with One city square in Church street.
I believe stage two to Brisbane should go beneath the Parramatta river in good ground and that is why the station is at the base of the 30,000 space carpark.
Property would be bought with lottery funds so there is no risk and no pushback from locals when excavation starts which would take a year while designing the building but my emails have fallen on deaf ears so maybe Parramatta council could run it.
Parrahub depends on a lottery to avoid interest payments and pressure to cut corners on the flood proof and earthquake proof building designed to stand 200 years.
Re: Sydney to Melbourne Maglev
Meet the press Ed Husic minister for industry and science.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvTVhtg ... cmFsaWE%3D
If he decides to connect Melbourne to Sydney with SC maglev earning $1.4b p/a selling the tech to big countries worldwide the Liberals, Independents, Greens and most voters be in agreement with China driving it in two years so we call the shots in the south China sea.
Regarding retiring in Parrahub these guys think a change in routine can avert Alzheimer's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-25glNBNGSI&t=40s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvTVhtg ... cmFsaWE%3D
If he decides to connect Melbourne to Sydney with SC maglev earning $1.4b p/a selling the tech to big countries worldwide the Liberals, Independents, Greens and most voters be in agreement with China driving it in two years so we call the shots in the south China sea.
Regarding retiring in Parrahub these guys think a change in routine can avert Alzheimer's
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-25glNBNGSI&t=40s