Hi all,
So, why RCC/reinforced concrete(PS) is not of interest as MOC for the tube? Also, can 3D printing help improve the acceptability of reinforced concrete?
RCC might also have better strength in compression (external pressure, vacuum inside). If accidental debris is a possible concern, a thinner steel tube may still be used.
Faster construction, reparability, reliability of construction(leakages, joints), lower side strength(weight of sections) - tension more important criteria, what exactly?
Thanks.
PS: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora ... 6bcba9fdd2
Tube - Steel (why not RCC?)
Return to “Hyperloop concepts”
Jump to
- Maglev Projects and Research
- ↳ Fundamental issues relating to mobility, transport and Maglev
- ↳ Hyperloop concepts
- ↳ Other fields of application for Maglev technologies
- ↳ ASIA
- ↳ Japan
- ↳ Chuo Maglev Shinkansen (Tokyo - Nagoya - Osaka)
- ↳ Linimo HSST Nagoya
- ↳ PR China and Taiwan
- ↳ Shanghai Transrapid (EMS High Speed Maglev)
- ↳ Shanghai - Hangzhou 上海 - 杭州
- ↳ General maglev debate in China
- ↳ Medium Speed / Urban Maglev
- ↳ Korea (South)
- ↳ High Speed (SUMA 550)
- ↳ Medium Speed (Ecobee)
- ↳ Korean Hyperloops
- ↳ India
- ↳ RUSSIA and EUROPE / EU
- ↳ Germany
- ↳ Russian Federation
- ↳ RUSSIA: The St. Petersburg - Moscow Project
- ↳ Scandinavia
- ↳ United Kingdom
- ↳ Poland
- ↳ THE AMERICAS
- ↳ North America
- ↳ USA: Baltimore - Washington Maglev Project
- ↳ USA: Dallas to Fort Worth High Speed transport corridor
- ↳ USA Transport
- ↳ South America
- ↳ Brazil: Cobra Urban Maglev Research
- ↳ ARAB COUNTRIES; AUSTRALIA, NZ and AFRICAN COUNTRIES
- ↳ African Countries
- ↳ Australia, NZ
- ↳ Arab Countries
- ↳ People, Conferences & Events, Websites & Publications, Anniversaries
- ↳ Personalities & Anniversaries
- ↳ Conferences & Events
- ↳ Websites, Web & Publications
- ↳ Job vacancies in transport research and science